Selling out
Date: Monday 20th August 2007 11:01 BST
Music: Prodigy
I an not a fanboy of Microsoft nor Apple. I use both without
problems but I am not happy with the new attitude of these companies. They seem
to be more interested in making money than high quality products. Apple have
moved over to Intel for what I have been lead to believe was for bulk discounts
on orders and increased performance. IBM however have argued that Apple's
benchmark between PowerPC and Intel X86_64 was unfair as the software did not
take advantage of the PowerPC architecture. When IBM compiled the same
benchmark from the source with their PowerPC optimised compiler they got a 187%
improvement over apples score on the same system.
(http://blogs.zdnet.com/Murphy/?p=678). This makes me think that Apple could
have done a better job with PowerPC and that there was no real need to drop IBM
for Intel especially since the POWER6 processor seems to be what Apple wanted.
What I think MS and Apple should do is make one OS for
computers / workstations and another for servers but instead Apple have put
back their OS in favour of the iPhone, it's shinny but not worth it in my
option. MS on the other had have made about 7 different versions just for
computers, they haven't even released the ones for the servers yet. To try and
stop people from illegally downloading their OS they made a starter version for
them which is heavily handicapped. The best way to encourage them to by the OS
is to make a really shit one that they can afford, cos that will work.
My bitch about apple and MS take 2.
In the past year both Apple and Microsoft have been getting
on my nervous with their attitude. They seem to be more interested in making
profit than high quality products that people would want to buy.
Microsoft are pushing people to upgrade to Vista, their new
operating system, by not releasing DirectX10 for windows XP meaning that if
people want to play the latest games they have to have a vista computer.
Microsoft have also caused confusion not only for it’s general users but the
computer experts as well by releasing several different versions of the same
OS. With Windows XP you had home edition or the professional edition if you
wanted extra security and network abilities, There is also the 64bit version of
Windows XP Professional for those who needed a lot of memory or used 64bit
programs but this was only used by the high end market. Vista has about 5
different versions and that is without going into the different types of ways
you get it. These are just the versions for the desktop or workstation, they
probably have just as many versions for the servers. I think it would be so
much easier for everyone if they had one OS for desktops and workstations and
another OS for servers.
Apple have been annoying me with they iPod / iPhone because
they seem to have put in a lot of resources into this instead of concentrating
on their computers. Apple used to be mainly a computer company as shown by
their name that was Apple Computers Inc. before they changed it to Apple Inc.
after they starting making shinny things that you can put in your pocket. The
development of the iPhone has pushed back the release of the new OS called Mac
OS X 10.5 Leopard and as a result OS X 10.4 Tiger has gone to subversion 11
instead of stopping at the subversion of 9 like all the other releases of OS X
have.